NCAA Baseball
Regional Results
2000

Super Regionals complete.

New readers should consult a separate page that gives some general background information on the records, polls, RPI, ISR, PP, etc information included in the table below. (An "N" indicates a "national" seed.) As usual, the polls and data are from from Monday, 22 May 2000, when the regional pairings and seedings were announced. The PP is based on games through 5/21. Again, many thanks to Rick Rollins for the conference standings that make my "etc..." column and a separate analysis of performance grouped by conference possible, and to Boyd Nation for the pseudo-RPI and ISR information generated from Rick's database.

The average ISR for the field is 112.3, plus or minus a standard deviation of 9.5.
The median ISR is 113.2.

The highest pseudo-RPI ranking without a bid was #29 Georgia (#7 in SEC).

Note: The NCAA identified the regions only by location, so the region numbering scheme is my own creation, reflecting the seeding of the associated super regional and identifying which regional has a top-8 nationally seeded team.

Super Regional Summary:

I order these results in almost the same way the NCAA does (they use 1-8, 5-4, 2-7, 6-3), reflecting the pairings in the CWS brackets.


       Super Regional 1:    U.LA-Lafayette  3  7  3  ==>  meets 8
                         at So. Carolina    6  1  2 

       Super Regional 8:    Nebraska      7  1  2 
                         at Stanford      3  7  5  ==>  meets 1

       Super Regional 4:    Mississippi St   4   4 
                         at Clemson         11   9  ==>  meets 5

       Super Regional 5:    San Jose St   5  2  3  ==>  meets 4
                         at Houston       3  5  2 

            ==========================

       Super Regional 2:    UCLA          2   8 
                         at Louisiana St  8  14  ==>  meets 7

       Super Regional 7:    Penn St       3   0 
                         at Texas         7  10  ==>  meets 2

       Super Regional 3:    So. California  7   6  ==>  meets 6
                         at Georgia Tech    2   3 

       Super Regional 6:    Miami         2  7  1 
                         at Florida St    9  5  6  ==>  meets 3

            ==========================

Complete Results:

Note: The regional names in square brackets were "officially" determined by Craig Gowens, now and forever the "Commissioner of the SWC". All series start on 26 May. The order here is by seed, not by future CWS pairing (which is the 1-8, 5-4, 2-7, 6-3 order used in NCAA listings).


                       NCAA  Record   Polls  Boyd Nation
 Seed Team            Result W  L  T  CB BA  RPI  ISR PP  etc....
 ==== =============== ====== =======  == ==  ===  === ==  ===============

  Region 1 [Atlantic I] - Columbia, SC
  ---------------------   ------------

 N1   So. Carolina    WW W   52-8      3  2    1  128 +4  SEC (#1 E1, champ)
  2   Wake Forest     WLWL   39-18-1  14 18   14  117 -4  ACC (#4)
  4   Liberty         LWL    35-21     .  .   56  110 +2  Big South champ (#1)
  3   Seton Hall      LL     40-16     .  .   35  108 -1  Big East (#3)

  Region 1a [Bayou II] - Lafayette, LA
  --------------------   -------------

  2   U.LA-Lafayette  WW W   42-17     .  .   28  117 -1  Sun Belt (#2)
  1   East Carolina   WLWL   44-16    -- 24   13  117 +5  Colonial champ (#1t)
  4   Marist          LWL    32-17-2   .  .  157   93 -3  Metro Atl. champ (#4)
  3   McNeese St      LL     39-18     .  .   43  114 -2  Southland (#1t)

     ===>   Super Regional 1:    U.LA-Lafayette  3  7  3  ==>  meets 8
                              at So. Carolina    6  1  2 

            ==========================

  Region 2 [Bayou I] - Baton Rouge, LA
  ------------------   ---------------

 N1   Louisiana St    WW W   43-17     7  7    2  125  0  SEC champ (#2 W1)
  3   U.LA-Monroe     WLWL   39-20     .  .   79  112  0  Southland (#1t)
  2   New Orleans     LWL    37-23     .  .   23  113 -2  Sun Belt (#1)
  4   Jackson St      LL     26-28     .  .  212   88 +6  SWAC champ (E2)

  Region 2a [Midwest II] - Oklahoma City, OK
  ----------------------   -----------------

  1   UCLA            WW W   35-24    22 --   45  115 -1  Pac-10 (#1t)
  2   Oklahoma        WLWL   39-21    29 --   20  119 +8  Big-12 (#3)
  3   Oral Roberts    LWL    48-13    30 --   49  110 +3  Mid Cont. champ (#1)
  4   Delaware        LL     37-18     .  .   87  100 -3  Am. East champ (#1)

     ===>   Super Regional 2:    UCLA          2   8 
                              at Louisiana St  8  14  ==>  meets 7

            ==========================

  Region 3 [East II] - Atlanta, GA
  ------------------   -----------

 N1   Georgia Tech    WW W   47-14     1  1    4  123  0  ACC champ (#1)
  3   Stetson         WLWL   46-14    28 25   27  113 +1  Trans Am. champ (#3)
  2   Auburn          LWL    40-18    19 19   22  120  0  SEC (#5 W3)
  4   Ga. Southern    LL     38-21     .  .   71  109 +2  Southern champ (#1t)

  Region 3a [West I] - Fullerton, CA
  ------------------   ---------------

  1   So. California  WW W   38-18    16 13   12  123 +3  Pac-10 (#4)
  2   CSU,Fullerton   LWWL   36-19    17 20   33  119 -3  Big West champ (#1t)
  3   Loyola Marymnt  WLL    39-17    20 12   46  118 -1  West Coast champ (C1)
  4   Virginia Tech   LL     34-23-2   .  .   74  104 +2  Atl-10 champ (W1t)

     ===>   Super Regional 3:    So. California  7   6  ==>  meets 6
                              at Georgia Tech    2   3 

            ==========================

  Region 4 [East I] - Clemson, SC
  -----------------   -----------

 N1   Clemson         WW W   45-16     8  9    6  122 +2  ACC (#2)
  4   Middle Tenn St  LWWL   37-21     .  .  122  104 +1  OH Valley champ (#3)
  3   Illinois        WLL    40-21     .  .   54  107  0  Big Ten champ (#3t)
  2   Old Dominion    LL     33-22-1   .  .   18  111 -2  Colonial (#1t)

  Region 4a [South II] - Starkville, MS
  --------------------   --------------

  1   Mississippi St  WW LW  38-17    12 17   16  119 -2  SEC (#3 W2)
  3   Notre Dame      WLWWL  43-16     .  .   34  109 +4  Big East (#2)
  2   Tulane          LWL    37-20-1   .  .   26  114 +4  Conf USA (#2)
  4   So. Alabama     LL     27-31     .  .   93  104 -1  Sun Belt champ (#5)

     ===>   Super Regional 4:    Mississippi St   4   4 
                              at Clemson         11   9  ==>  meets 5

            ==========================

  Region 5 [Bayou III] - Houston, TX
  --------------------   -----------

 N1   Houston         WW LW  44-15     9  6    5  121 -2  Conf.USA champ (#1)
  2   Rice            WLWWL  40-21    24 --   51  116 -2  WAC champ (#1t)
  3   Texas Tech      LWL    35-24     .  .   59  113  0  Big-12 (#5)
  4   Princeton       LL     24-18     .  .  100   98 +4  Ivy champ (Gehrig#1)

  Region 5a [Central] - Waco, TX
  -------------------   --------

  3   San Jose St     WW LW  36-20     .  .   73  115 +2  WAC (#1t)
  2   Florida         LWWWL  41-21-1  18 14    9  120 +3  SEC (#4 E2)
  4   SW Texas St     WLL    33-27     .  .   65  110 +2  Southland champ (#3)
  1   Baylor          LL     45-15     5  5   11  122 +2  Big-12 (#1)

     ===>   Super Regional 5:    San Jose St   5  2  3  ==>  meets 4
                              at Houston       3  5  2 

            ==========================

  Region 6 [South I] - Tallahassee, FL
  ------------------   ---------------

 N1   Florida St      WLWWW  45-15    10 10    3  123 -2  ACC (#3)
  2   Central Fla     WW LL  41-17    27 --   24  113 +2  Trans Am (#1)
  3   Evansville      LWL    40-20     .  .   75  109 +2  Mo Valley (#2)
  4   Bethune-Cookman LL     33-27     .  .  127   97 +1  MEAC champ (S3)

  Region 6a [Atlantic II] - Coral Gables, FL
  -----------------------   ----------------

  1   Miami (FL)      WW W   37-17-1  11 11   17  116 -3  Independent (#2)
  3   Fla Internatl   LWWL   40-18     .  .   47  111 +5  Sun Belt (#3)
  2   Fla Atlantic    WLL    42-17     .  .   32  113 -1  Trans Am (#2)
  4   Wagner          LL     24-28-1   .  .  253   83 +1  Northeast champ (S3)

     ===>   Super Regional 6:    Miami         2  7  1 
                              at Florida St    9  5  6  ==>  meets 3

            ==========================

  Region 7 [Rocky Mtn] - Tempe, AZ
  --------------------   ---------

  2   Texas           WLWWW  40-18    13 16   25  120  0  Big-12 (#4)
 N1   Arizona St      WW LL  42-13     4  4   15  124 -3  Pac-10 champ (#1t)
  4   Miami (OH)      LWL    39-21     .  .   78  104 -3  MAC champ (E3)
  3   Creighton       LL     38-21     .  .   64  110  0  Mo Valley (#3)

  Region 7a [Northeast] - Montclair, NJ
  ---------------------   -------------

  3   Penn St         LWWWW  41-16     .  .   57  108 -3  Big Ten (#2)
  2   N. Carolina     WW LL  44-15    15 21    7  121 +1  ACC (#5)
  1   Rutgers         WLL    39-16    25 15    8  111 -5  Big East champ (#1)
  4   Army            LL     24-18-1   .  .  158   92 +6  Patriot champ (#3)

     ===>   Super Regional 7:    Penn St       3   0 
                              at Texas         7  10  ==>  meets 2

            ==========================

  Region 8 [West II] - Palo Alto, CA
  ------------------   -------------

 N1   Stanford        WW LW  42-13     2  3   10  126 +1  Pac-10 (#1t)
  2   Alabama         WLWWL  38-22    21 23   21  118 -1  SEC (#6 W4)
  3   Nevada          LWL    37-17    23 22   72  116 -2  Big West (#1t)
  4   Fresno St       LL     40-19     .  .   41  118  0  WAC (#3)

  Region 8a [Midwest I] - Minneapolis, MN
  ---------------------   ---------------

  1   Nebraska        WW W   47-15     6  8   19  120 -4  Big-12 champ (#2)
  3   Wichita St      LWWL   42-19    26 --   60  112 +3  Mo Valley champ (#1)
  2   Minnesota       WLL    37-22     .  .   42  109 -2  Big Ten (#1)
  4   Butler          LL     31-26     .  .  139   90 -4  Midwestern champ (#4)

     ===>   Super Regional 8:    Nebraska      7  1  2 
                              at Stanford      3  7  5  ==>  meets 1

            ==========================

Related information:

In addition, I include the usual list of "bridesmaid" teams. Several of these were obvious and proposed by many newsgroup readers, others stood out in Boyd's rankings, and some were picked just to placate or annoy regular newsgroup readers. There are none missing with an ISR of 111 or above.

This list of possible teams is of particular interest with the expansion of the tournament to 64 teams. One can compare the thresholds used in past years (where we also have RPI and ISR data) to those used with the expanded field. Teams that exceed the objective thresholds in the pseudo-RPI and ISR which lead me to think they deserve consideration are flagged in the table below. However, it is important to note that these numeric scores from computer rating formulae are not the only criteria used by the selection committee, nor should they be the only criteria used.

Decisive criteria included strength of non-conference schedule and performance in the conference tournament, in addition to the overall season performance numbers we tabulate here. For example, the chairman of the NCAA selection committee said in a televised interview that the reason Oklahoma State was left out (presumably one of the last ones dropped) was its 0-2 ending to the season in the conference tournament, a 6th place finish in the conference, and a weak out-of-conference schedule.

Examination of the table below shows that conference finish was undoubtedly the reason every team with a pseudo-RPI high enough to make the field strictly by the numbers (those marked with an "*") was left out by the committee. This is clearly the case for the teams from the third quartile of the SEC and in the bottom third of the ACC. It also seems clear that the committee will not go as deep in a conference like the Colonial which has not had much success in past NCAA tournaments (see past conference ranking histograms linked from the index page) and probably has a weaker overall conference RPI and out-of-conference strength of schedule.

An interesting case for the role of the RPI is Pepperdine. Last year they had a pseudo-RPI of 32 and a high (122) ISR and got an at-large invite and did very well. This year their ISR is much lower (114) and the pseudo-RPI of 83 kept them out of the tournament. The weakness of their conference (frequently a "play in" conference in past years) makes their out-of-conference strength of schedule critical for how they rank in the NCAA's eyes.

... RPI analysis NOT YET COMPLETE ...

??? link annotated file comparing pRPI and actual RPI ???


   Overlooked ?   (ordered by ISR, records may not be accurate) 
   ----------

                             Record   Polls  Boyd Nation
 Seed Team                   W  L  T  CB BA  RPI ISR  PP  etc....
 ==== =============== ...... =======  == ==  === ===  ==  ===============

  X*  Kentucky               36-20     .  .   31  115 +1  SEC (#8 E4)
  X*  Georgia                30-26     .  .   29  114 -3  SEC (#7 E3)
  X   Pepperdine             35-22     .  .   83  114 -1  West Coast (W1)
  X*  Long Beach St          31-25     .  .   44  113  0  Big West (#4t)
      Tennessee              37-23     .  .   58  113 -7  SEC (#10 E5)
  *   Mississippi            29-25     .  .   36  112 +2  SEC (#9 W5)
      California             25-28     .  .   53  112 -4  Pac-10 (#5)
      Oklahoma St            36-22     .  .   63  111 -4  Big-12 (#6)
  *   NC State               30-28     .  .   37  110 +3  ACC (#6t)
      Arizona                26-29     .  .   88  110 +1  Pac-10 (#7)
      Hawaii                 27-26     .  .   98  110  0  WAC (#4)
  *   Va Commonwealth        39-22     .  .   30  109 -2  Colonial (#5)
  *   James Madison          37-22     .  .   40  109  0  Colonial (#4)
      Southern Miss.         32-26     .  .   69  109 -3  Conf USA (#3)
  *   Purdue                 35-23     .  .   38  108  0  Big Ten (#3t)
  *   UNC - Wilmington       36-23     .  .   39  108 +2  Colonial (#3)
      Virginia               26-31     .  .   48  107 +2  ACC (#6t)
      San Diego St           32-28     .  .  114  106  0  Mtn West champ (#2)
      New Mexico             29-21     .  .  140  106  0  Mtn West (#1)
      CSU,Northridge         17-32     .  .  200  101 -1  independent (#7)

 ---------------

  X - denotes team with Boyd's computer ranking above the 113.3
      median for regional tournament teams.  The lowest ISR of an 
      at-large team was 108 (Penn St and Seton Hall).

  * - denotes team with a higher pseudo-RPI than the natural cutoff 
      for a 64-team tournament after automatic bids are used up [44]. 

 ==== =============== ====== =======  == ==  === ===  ==  ===============